« At the very least, the Amazon reviews demonstrate
that an awareness of the cultural and historical specificity embedded in a character’s
experience can coexist rather comfortably with cross-cultural identification
and feelings of shared humanity. Scholarly arguments frequently frame the two
perspectives as mutually exclusive, at times endorsing a version of identity politics
that scoffs at notions of universality, dismissing the ability of individuals
within a privileged demographic category to understand the experience of those
at the margins. And critics may be correct in asserting a contradiction or
tension between the urge to identify with characters and the urge to
acknowledge difference; but nonacademic readers are apparently able to manage
this contradiction, negotiating effortlessly, if sometimes unthinkingly,
between the two urges, each of which is necessary, I would argue, in different
circumstances to manage the complicated social challenges that a multiethnic
and globalized America produces. Perhaps responsible for readers’ untroubled
capacity to perform this particular oscillation is the manifestly affective
character of their interpretive experience – a state of responsiveness that can
eschew the logical imperative to decide between two incongruous perspectives. »
Aucun commentaire:
Enregistrer un commentaire